Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. 34915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

From a judgment of dismissal, following a jury verdict for the defendant in a personal-injury action, the plaintiff appeals. The assignments of error raise issues *618concerning the admissibility of certain evidence and whether requested instructions should have been given.

The plaintiff, a locomotive engineer, is claimed to be totally and permanently disabled in consequence of a heart condition. It is the plaintiff’s contention that for a three-week period, while sleeping in a boarding house maintained by the defendant railroad, gas emanating from chloropicrin (placed in the attic of the building…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HinkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sutton v. MathewsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Barnes v. LABOR HALL ASS'N., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. McMurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Blancher v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Cowan v. C., M., ST. P. & PAC. R.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cole v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API