Stutsman v. City of Burlington
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines District Court.— Hon. W. S'. Withrow, Judge. A portion of the cost of curbing and paving the street was assessed against three lots belonging to plaintiff. On appeal to the district court the levy was approved, and he again appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
On the 17th day of November, 1902, the council of defendant adopted a resolution that it was necessary and advisable to make the following improvement, to-wit:
1. Street improvement: sufficiency of order. T'o grade, curb and pave with brick on concrete foundation Foster street, from the south side of Spray street to the south side of West avenue, said paving to be 36 feet in width between the curbs, and the cost of the same be assessed and levied as a special tax upon the real property adjacent to 'and abutting upon that part of the street or alleys upon which the said improvement shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. v. LindquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Martin v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Smith v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Gill v. PattonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Camp v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Andre v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Kneebs v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. City of SpencerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1922
- Dubbert v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.