Legal Opinion

Crane v. . Carswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

No appeal lies to this Court from the discretionary determination of an application for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 316. But where the applicant fails to make out a showing of “newly discovered evidence,” as this phrase is defined in the law (S. v. Casey, 201 N. C., 620, 161 S. E., 81), no occasion arises for the exercise of the court’s discretion. Stilley v. Planing Mills, 161 N. C., 517, 77 S. E., 760. We agree with the defendant that plaintiff’s showing on his application for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Stilley v. Goldsboro Planing Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. . SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Bullock v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. McCulloh v. Catawba CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API