State v. . Speller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The question for decision is the correctness of the rulings on the motion to quash.
A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the findings and rulings of the trial court on the defendant’s motion to quash the indictment are without support in the factual evidence. True, it is stated by at least two of the witnesses that the Commissioners intended and practiced “no discrimination” in the drawing of jurors, but these are conclusional statements which run counter to the facts. For instance, the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners says the red and black scrolls were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Patton v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pierre v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.