Legal Opinion

Steffen v. Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 19, 2003No. 802CV1462T30TGWPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before this Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and memorandum of law (Dkts.# 43, 44) and Plaintiffs response (Dkt.# 55) thereto. 1 Defendants filed a reply (Dkt.# 66), and at this Court’s request both parties filed supplemental memoranda (Dkts.# 78, 85). In addition, Defendants filed a Motion to Strike Stef-fen’s Third Declaration in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.# 90) and Plaintiffs filed a response (Dkt.# 92) thereto. After close consideration, this Court concludes that summary judgment should be granted because…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Marvin P. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Menchise v. Akerman SenterfittCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. NeiswongerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  5. In Re Telcar Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API