In re Ross
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal from Bickerton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, by
Judd, O.J.
A petition in due form to annul the election of Nobles for the Division of Oahu was filed and presented, and all the requisites of the statute regarding notice, etc., complied with. ■ It came on for hearing before Mr. Justice Bickerton, who filed, on the 30th of March, a full statement of his findings of law and -fact, dismissing the petition. From this the petitioners perfected an *479appeal to the Court in Banco. At the hearing before us, the petitioners, through their counsel, Messrs. A. S. Hartwell and C. W. Ashford, stated that they accepted all the findings…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Lonoaea v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1895
- McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Pub. Access Shoreline v. HAWAII CTY PLANNING COMMISSIONHawaii Supreme Court · 1995