Ronnie Stilwell v. City of Williams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ
*1238OPINION
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Ronnie Stilwell sued his city employer for retaliation, alleging that he was fired for planning to testify against the City in a lawsuit relating to age discrimination. Stilwell asserted that his termination violated both the First Amendment and the retaliation provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(d). The question we must answer is whether the retaliation provision of the ADEA precludes a plaintiff such as Stilwell from bringing a First Amendment retaliation claim under 42…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Paul Maney v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Thomas Mooney v. Douglas FifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Coleman v. Home Health Resources Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.