Legal Opinion

Ronnie Stilwell v. City of Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2016No. 14-15540PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ

*1238OPINION

FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Ronnie Stilwell sued his city employer for retaliation, alleging that he was fired for planning to testify against the City in a lawsuit relating to age discrimination. Stilwell asserted that his termination violated both the First Amendment and the retaliation provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(d). The question we must answer is whether the retaliation provision of the ADEA precludes a plaintiff such as Stilwell from bringing a First Amendment retaliation claim under 42…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  3. Paul Maney v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Thomas Mooney v. Douglas FifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Coleman v. Home Health Resources Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API