Legal Opinion

Owens v. Snider

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1915No. 5454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Harmon County;' Frank Mathews, Judge. Action by W. L. Owens against Albert Snider and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error in the district court of Harmon county for the purpose of obtaining an injunction to prevent defendants from taking water for purposes of irrigation from Sandy creek, which is a small stream, fed by springs and meandering through Harmon county and across and through the lands of plaintiff, Owens, and also the lands of defendants and various other landowners,, not parties to the suit. The plaintiff, for a cause of action, set out that he was, on July 25, 1911, awarded a license or permit from the secretary of the Board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Boise Irrigation & Land Co. v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Gay v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand-Hydro v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Talley v. CarleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. El Paso & R. I. Ry. Co. v. District Court of Fifth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API