Legal Opinion
Hallenbeck v. St. Mark Evangelist Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 1, 1992No. 10908PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The principal issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the trial court incorrectly determined that the town of West Hartford had not properly intervened as a party plaintiff, pursuant to the workers’ compensation law; General Statutes § 31-293 (a);1 *620in this action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant for injuries the plaintiff had sustained while in the course of his employment for the town. We agree that the trial court’s determination was incorrect.
The town, within thirty days of the notice to it of the suit by the plaintiff, simultaneously filed two pleadings, one entitled…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Tax Collector v. MileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. NesteriakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Griffiths v. Hartford Hospital, No. Cv 96-0384991s (Oct. 16, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.