Legal Opinion

Helena Chemical Co. v. Rivenbark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1980No. 7913SC511PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The question presented is whether the court erred in allowing plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the defendants.

On 22 November 1976, plaintiff started this suit on a note in the amount of $25,029.26 executed by the male defendant on 31 December 1975. The note was under seal and was due on 31 August 1976. Defendant admits the execution and nonpayment of the note. The female is sued on a guaranty and also admits the authenticity of the document.

The defenses raised in defendants’ pleading were also set out in defendants’ affidavit filed 8 December 1978 in response to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Smithwick v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Cone v. ConeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Howell v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Tinkham (In re Outer Banks Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
  5. Radford v. KeithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API