Legal Opinion

Howell v. Butler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 818SC1277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the court erred in entering summary judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs argue the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits raise an issue of “fraud, duress or undue influence” in the defendants’ execution of the promissory note and deed of trust. Plaintiffs contend that as a *74result of harassment and threats they signed the promissory note and Nadine Howell executed the deed of trust securing same. Defendants denied these allegations. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was supported by pleadings and affidavits showing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Helena Chemical Co. v. RivenbarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Barnes v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rabun Cnty. Bank v. Highlands Land Holding Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API