Chenoweth v. Deavers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
(Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Only one question is presented by this proceeding in error, and that is whether the lease relied upon by plaintiffs is a valid lease under the acts of Congress and the decisions of this court based thereon.
It appears from the testimony preserved in the record, that on January 1, 1920, a man named Mitchell took a lease on the premises here involved for the years 1920- and 1921, and that in July, 1920, these instant plaintiffs took a lease upon the same premises for a period of three years, beginning January l, 1922. It is stipulated between the parties that Sallfe Thomas,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Mullen v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Walker v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Taylor v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Yates v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harley v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Flynt v. HastingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Carter v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933