Legal Opinion
Flynt v. Hastings
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 23, 1926No. 16982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This appeal is by the defendants below. Reference is made to the parties as they there appeared.
The plaintiff. Hastings, alleged he was entitled to possession of a surplus allotment of Lucy Scótt, a full-blood Mississippi Choctaw Indian, by virtue of a lease from Lucy Scott dated March 2. 1925; that Flynt and his codefendants were in unlawful possession of said premises.
On February 25, 1920. Lucy Scott executed an agricultural lease to R. H. Chowning upon said lands; by the terms of this lease the same expired February 24, 1925. Before the expiration of said lease and on December 1, 1924.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wheeler v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Carden v. HumbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowland v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Reirdon v. BronaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928