Legal Opinion
Harley v. McCasland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 21, 1933No. 21372PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayleiss, J.
T. I-I. McCasland instituted an action in the district court of Stephens county against A. N. Harley and others for the possession of certain real estate and for damages for the wrongful detention thereof. Judgment was for McCasland, and Harley appeals. The parties will be referred to in this opinion in the order in which they appeared in the trial court.
The facts involved in this matter are very simple and Were all stipulated to, except some additional testimony on the part of Harley. The real estate involved was allotted to Dora Plall, a full-blood Choctaw Indian, as a part of her surplus…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bunch v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Whitham v. LehmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hancock v. MaurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowland v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Gladys Stray Calf v. Scott Land & Livestock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Gladys Stray Calf v. Scott Land & Livestock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977