Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Bethlehem

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2006No. 258 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Charles Hill and Helen Hill (together, Landowners) appeal from the order dated January 25, 2006, and docketed January 31, 2006, of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (trial court), which, after reconsideration, sustained the City of Bethlehem’s (City) preliminary objections to Landowners’ petition for appointment of a board of view (Petition). We affirm.

On July 19, 2005, Landowners filed a Petition pursuant to section 502(e) of the Eminent Domain Code 1 (Code), claiming a de facto taking of their home located at 620 Ridge Street (Property) in the City 2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Jacobs v. Nether Providence TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Millcreek Township v. N.E.A. Cross CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Estate of Blose Ex Rel. Blose v. Borough of PunxsutawneyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. German v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Linde Enterprises, Inc. v. Lackawanna River Basin Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. York Road Realty Co., L.P. v. Cheltenham Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Ristvey v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. 2800 N. Broad St., LLC v. Com. of PA, DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. C.F. Hughes v. UGI Storage Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API