Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Bergheim
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from Boulder District Court. Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Walling, Judge.
The action was brought to recover on certain policies of insurance issued by the appellant to the appellee and others. It will only be necessary to refer to the terms of the policy issued to the appellee, which was the basis of the first cause of action in the complaint, as typical of the policies set out in the remaining causes of action. The various losses complained of in the several causes of action occurred at the same time, as the result of the same cause. The judgment of the trial court was based upon a finding of the facts, which covered §11 of the causes of action.
*529By…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Transatlantic Fire Insurance v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Delametter v. the Home Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Mode, Ltd. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Exchange Bank of Novinger v. Iowa State Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.