People v. Alonzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Although this contention survives the defendant’s otherwise valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; People v Williams, 84 AD3d 1417, 1418 [2011]; People v Morrow, 48 AD3d 704, 705 [2008]), it is without merit. Several times during the defendant’s plea hearing he was asked if he had voluntarily participated in the subject robbery, and he responded that he had been forced to participate. However, although the defendant made statements that raised the possibility…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LebronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.