Legal Opinion
Hill v. Airborne Freight Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2002No. 1:97-cv-07098PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Kevin Hid (“Hill”), Breck Harrison (“Harrison”), Mark McCord (“McCord”), Duval Tyson (“Tyson”) and Damian Alvarez (“Alvarez”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), who are each African-American, brought this action alleging that Airborne Freight Corporation (“Airborne”) discriminated against them on the basis of their race by subjecting them to more severe discipline than similarly situated white employees. In addition, Hill asserted a retaliation claim against Airborne. 1 The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Mugavero v. ARMS ACRES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway HotelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Duarte v. St. Barnabas Hosp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.