Legal Opinion

Medellin v. Dretke

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 2005No. 04-5928PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari in this case to consider two questions: first, whether a federal court is bound by the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling that United States *662courts must reconsider petitioner José Medellin’s claim for relief under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, [1970] 21 U. S. T. 77, 100-101, T. I. A. S. No. 6820, without regard to procedural default doctrines; and second, whether a federal court should give effect, as a matter of judicial comity and uniform treaty interpretation, to the ICJ’s judgment. 543 U. S. 1032 (2004). After we granted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Maharaj v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Sorto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API