Medellin v. Dretke
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
We granted certiorari in this case to consider two questions: first, whether a federal court is bound by the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling that United States *662courts must reconsider petitioner José Medellin’s claim for relief under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, [1970] 21 U. S. T. 77, 100-101, T. I. A. S. No. 6820, without regard to procedural default doctrines; and second, whether a federal court should give effect, as a matter of judicial comity and uniform treaty interpretation, to the ICJ’s judgment. 543 U. S. 1032 (2004). After we granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Maharaj v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Sorto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.