Legal Opinion

State v. Ettenhofer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 18, 2003No. 28545-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 P.3d 478 (2003)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

John Anthony ETTENHOFER, Appellant.

No. 28545-2-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

November 18, 2003.

Therese M. Murphy, Attorney at Law, Chehalis, WA, for respondent.

Hugh Joseph McGavick, The Law Office of Hugh J. McGavick, Olympia, WA, for appellant.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

John Anthony Ettenhofer was convicted of manufacture of a controlled substance—marijuana. He appeals, alleging that the failure to have a written warrant to search his property requires suppression of the marijuana. Although officers gave a telephonic statement in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KennarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State v. KennarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. AaseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State Of Washington v. Frankie L. StricklenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Patricia LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API