State v. Kennar
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Sopi Daniel Kennar appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends that the plea was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intel*70ligently because the trial court misinformed him of the applicable maximum sentence. However, based on our review of the record, we find both that the trial court properly advised Kennar of the applicable maximum sentence and that Kennar knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered the plea. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Sopi Kennar entered into a plea agreement with the prosecutor whereby he agreed to plead guilty to second…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WaldonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. WaldonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. CodigaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CodigaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Optimer Intern, Inc. v. Rp Bellevue, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.