Eaden v. Estate of Evans
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 Washington’s antilapse statute, RCW 11.12.110, applies when a beneficiary under a will is deemed to have predeceased the testator, because he or she financially abused the testator under chapter 11.84 RCW. In this case, the testator’s intent did not overcome the presumed application of the antilapse statute. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees to both competing beneficiary groups and assessing those fees against the Estate. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Calvin H. Evans Sr. (Cal Sr.) was born on March 8, 1933. At the time of his death, Cal Sr. was no longer married…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anna Schemstad v. Robert J. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Estate Of Mildred G. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In Re Estate Of Karen Hurteau, Dana Floth Et Ano, Resp. V. Brandon Donaly, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- In Re Estate Of Karen Hurteau, Dana Floth Et Ano, Resp. V. Brandon Donaly, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- In Re The Estate Of: Gary M. Rusing, Laurene Rusing, App v. Christopher Rusing, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.