Legal Opinion
State v. Kelley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 2010No. 82111-9PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
226 P.3d 773 (2010)
168 Wash.2d 72
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Dustin Ross KELLEY, Petitioner.
No. 82111-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 29, 2009.
Decided January 21, 2010.
Rebecca Wold Bouchey, Attorney at Law, Mercer Island, WA, for Petitioner.
Kathleen Proctor, Melody M. Crick, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
MADSEN, C.J.
¶ 1 The defendant challenges the Court of Appeals' decision that double jeopardy principles are not violated by imposition of a firearm enhancement where use of a firearm is an element of the underlying offense. We…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Glover P. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.