Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 308A83PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the admission into evidence of the testimony of Jerry Makas tending to show the defendant’s commission of a separate offense. Jerry Makas, testifying on behalf of the State, was permitted to relate an encounter between the defendant and him on 4 August 1982, just over two months after the alleged assault on Marc Pruitt. According to Makas, he was walking to a convenience store on Country Club Road at about 11:15 p.m. when he first saw defendant. Defendant was in a van and drove past Makas several times. Defendant parked the van in front…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Shaffner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gezzi v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. KuplenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API