Legal Opinion

In re Josephson

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 3, 1916No. 2661PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Hannah Josephson and others, individually and as partners under the firm name of Josephsons, bankrupts. On objections to the discharge of the bankrupts. Discharge denied as to two of the partners, and granted one of the partners.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This matter comes up on objections to the discharge of the bankrupts; the bankrupts consisting of Hannah Josephson, Sam S. Josephson, and Julien Josephson, doing business under the firm name of Josephsons. Specifications were filed by Pontiac Shoe Manufacturing Company, Dougherty Shoe Company, and Krausse Bros. The specifications set forth that the bankrupts obtained property on credit, through material false statements in writing made to each of the above-named firms, and to the firm of Bradshaw Bros., and that, with intent to conceal their true financial condition,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  2. In re Newbury & DunhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. In re ArensonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  4. In re GoldichDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re PerlmutterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
  2. Modern Distributors, Inc. v. Gray (In Re Gray)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Green v. Geyen (In Re Geyen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981
  4. Rutland Savings Bank v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1980
  5. United States v. ToeplemanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API