Legal Opinion

In re Perlmutter

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 30, 1919PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Joseph Perlmutter and Harry Perl-mutter, individually and as copartners trading as “Perlmutters” and “The Quality Shop,” bankrupts. On exceptions to the special master’s report, recommending that discharges be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

REHFSTAB, District Judge.

[ 1 ] The special master, to whom was referred the objections to granting discharges to the individual bankrupts, Joseph Perlmutter and Harry Perlmutter, recommends that the objections be dismissed and the discharges granted. Of the assigned objections to granting the discharges, it is necessary to refer to only two. These are based upon clauses 3 and 4, respectively, of section 14b of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, Í898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 [Comp. St. § 9598]). The acts enumerated in these clauses, the coin-, milling of which works a denial of the bankrupt’s…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  5. Troeder v. LorschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re MayDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1980
  2. Comprehensive Accounting Corp. v. Morgan (In Re Cycle Accounting Services)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
  3. G & J Investments v. Zell (In Re Zell)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  4. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Mayo (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1988
  5. In Re HochbergDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API