Legal Opinion

Burket v. Bank of Hollywood

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1937No. L. A. 15902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

At the time the Bank of Hollywood was taken over by the superintendent of banks, it held certain money on deposit in an escrow account. The question upon this appeal is whether the respondents are entitled to pay ment of the money in full and in preference to the claims of the general creditors of the bank.

The escrow deposit was received by the bank in a transaction with F. O. Burket, Sr. He died shortly thereafter. The bank issued checks against the deposit made payable to Mr. Burket, Sr., and these came into the possession of respondent Virginia Burket, his widow, as the executrix of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McGhee v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Bank of America National Trus & Savings Ass'n. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Marsh v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Bork v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API