Legal Opinion

Pensky v. Aetna Life and Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to declare whether the appellant validly and timely disclaimed liability under a certain insurance policy, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 9, 1975, which, upon a stipulated statement of facts and certain exhibits, declared that appellant was required to appear on behalf of the defendants Pena and Alvarez, to defend both the main action and the cross claim of codefendant Jensky, and to provide them coverage. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and it is declared that the disclaimers of liability issued by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pensky v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Miranda v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York v. AMRO Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Parlato v. Interport Trucking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API