Legal Opinion

Menefield v. Bd. Of Parole Hearings

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 2017No. C083356Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/21/17 (Certified for Publication 7/7/17 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- JAMES FREDRICK MENEFIELD, C083356 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34201680002338CUWMGDS) v. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, Defendant and Respondent. This case is about the validity of a regulation governing a circumstance the Board of Parole Hearings (the board) can consider when determining whether a person convicted of a crime punishable with an indeterminate life sentence is unsuitable for parole: California Code of Regulations,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API