Microsoft Corp. v. United Computer Resources of New Jersey, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
In this Application, Plaintiff, Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $ 252,476.25 and $ 63,064.34 in costs, for prevailing in a contempt action which resulted in an Order directing Defendants to pay $ 158,-750.00 in sanctions to Microsoft for their contumacious conduct. Thus, Microsoft seeks to recover almost twice in fees and costs what it recovered against Defendants for violating an Order of this Court. Because I find that much of Microsoft’s fee application is the result of duplication of effort, and the overstaffing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- ARTWIDE INTERNATIONAL H.K. LIMITED v. FOSTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- INDUSTRIA DE ALIMENTOS ZENU S.A.S. v. LATINFOOD U.S. CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- MCNULTY v. THE MIDDLE EAST FORUMDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- MINEHAN v. MCDOWELLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.