Legal Opinion
ARTWIDE INTERNATIONAL H.K. LIMITED v. FOSTER
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 21, 2025No. 1:22-cv-06417Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ARTWIDE INTERNATIONAL H.K. LIMITED, Civil No. 22-6417 (CPO/EAP) Plaintiff, v. ANDREW FOSTER, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Artwide International H.K. Limited’s May 2, 2025 letter application, ECF No. 45, seeking contempt sanctions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45(g) and 69, for Defendants’ failure to comply with Plaintiff’s efforts to enforce its nearly $200,000 judgment. For the following reasons, the Court respectfully recommends that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.