Legal Opinion

People v. Harmon

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1948No. Crim. 2551PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendant was convicted of a felony—illegal possession of narcotics. The body of the information alleges that he wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously had in his possession a narcotic, to wit, heroin.

Health and Safety Code, section 11500, provides that no person shall possess a narcotic “except upon the written prescription of a physician, dentist, chiropodist, or veterinarian licensed to practice in this state.” Defendant contends that the exception must be negatived in the pleading. It has been held that the allegation that defendant unlawfully and feloniously possessed heroin is a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. WilkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. CandiottoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. RochinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. NeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API