Stanley v. Stanley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 10, 1936:
Fritz, J.
The order dated March 16, 1936, the last of three orders appealed from, was evidently intended to supersede in substance and effect the first and the second of those orders. Consequently, it suffices to consider the substance and effect of that last order, and if it cannot be sustained, the other orders must likewise be reversed. In passing upon those orders, which were all made upon hearings pursuant to William H. Stanley’s petition filed in December, 1935, for the construction of the will of his father, Lemuel C. Stan*347ley, it…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of StaabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Hayden v. NuzumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pugh v. FowlieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Richardson v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Stanley v. BradfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Estate of NorthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.