Legal Opinion

Schleissner v. Town of Provincetown

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 30, 1989No. 88-P-507PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.

After a trial without a jury, a judge of the Superior Court concluded that the town of Provincetown had created a nuisance in its storm water disposal system, which periodically floods the plaintiff’s property. The judge awarded the plaintiff damages of $15,000, without interest, to compensate her for the loss of the use and enjoyment of her property, and gave the town the alternative of either disconnecting certain storm drains which cause the flooding or paying the plaintiff an additional $35,000. The town has appealed the finding that it has created a nuisance. Both the town and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Harrison v. Textron, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Patrazza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Asiala v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeSanctis v. Lynn Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Bailey v. ShribergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Morrissey v. New England Deaconess Ass'n - Abundant Life Communities, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Murphy v. Town of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Tarzia v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API