Legal Opinion

Tarzia v. Town of Hingham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 22, 1993No. 91-P-273PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs allege that as a result of the overflow of a town river and pond they sustained bodily injury and property damage. A judge of the Superior Court, sitting without a jury, found for the town on all counts of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Of the several counts in the plaintiffs’ complaint only those alleging negligence and private nuisance are being pressed on this appeal from the ensuing judgment. 2 We reach a Solomonic conclusion: the negligence claim was correctly decided by the trial judge; the nuisance claim was not. 3

Since 1973, the plaintiffs, Donald and Dorothy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Harry Stoller & Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Cady v. Plymouth-Carver Regional School DistrictMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DeSanctis v. Lynn Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Morrissey v. New England Deaconess Ass'n - Abundant Life Communities, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Chiao-Yun Ku v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Murphy v. Town of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API