State v. Billups
Oregon Supreme Court
From Crook: William L. Bradshaw, Judge. The defendant, John Billups, was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The defendant, John Billups, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered on the verdict.
1. His counsel maintain that an error was committed in overruling a demurrer to the indictment, interposed on the ground inter alia that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute the commission of a crime. The formal parts of the accusation strictly conform to the averments of an information, the charging part of which has been approved. State v. Carmody, 50 Or. 1 (91 Pac. 446, 1081: 12 L. R. A. [N. S.]…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Marsden v. HarlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Roesch v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. WilburOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Astoria v. MaloneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Benson v. Election CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.