Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Raytheon Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 2008No. B195536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

The County of Los Angeles (County) appeals from the judgment entered in this property tax refund action, contending the trial court erred in ruling Raytheon Company and the DirecTV Group, Inc., successors in interest to Hughes Aircraft Company (Hughes), have standing to seek a refund of property tax levied in the tax year 1991-1992 on parcels occupied by Hughes under long-term leases that require Hughes to pay the real property taxes. The County also contends the refund action is time-barred notwithstanding the parties’ written stipulation to waive any limitations defense…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. First American Commercial Real Estate Services Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Fisher v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Greenspan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API