Rosenthal v. Harker
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by David Rosenthal against Henry Harber. Judgment for plaintiff, a new trial was denied, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.
Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court for Salt Lake county to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned to him by reason of the defendant’s careless and negligent operation of an automobile upon State street, Salt Lake City. The negligence charged in the complaint against the defendant is as follows: Driving the automobile at a greater speed than was reasonable and safe — thirty-five miles per hour; not having the automobile under immediate control; and failing to give any warning upon approaching and attempting to pass the plaintiff.
The answer denied all carelessness…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Masterton v. . Village of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Amos Wade v. Jacob R. Leroy and Henry E. PierrepointSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Bierbach v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Kronold v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Umphrey Ex Rel. Umphrey v. DeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Sohm v. DIXIE EYE CENTERCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Corbett v. SeamonsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Judd v. DrezgaUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Judd v. DrezgaUtah Supreme Court · 2004