Legal Opinion · Dissent

Judd v. Drezga

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2004No. 20010646Published

1DissentDurham, Chief Justice

142 I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion analyzes the plaintiffs constitutional claims under the wrong standard of review and reaches the wrong result. The plaintiff has challenged the statute in question as a violation of due process, equal protection, the remedies clause of Utah's "open courts" provision, the separation of powers doctrine, and the right to a jury trial. Despite the protection each of these rights receives in the Utah Constitution,1 and despite this court's clear precedent requiring a heightened standard of review in such challenges, the majority instead identifies a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API