Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Henry Manuszak, A/K/A "Sassy Doc", Appeal of Charles Iannece

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 16, 1976No. 75-1294PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, having been acquitted of certain gambling charges in a state proceeding, asserts that the district court could not revoke his federal probation on the basis of uncontradicted evidence of his gambling activities. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Iannece’s probation and therefore affirm.

I

On January 29, 1974 appellant, Charles Iannece, pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to Count I of a two-count indictment, which charged him with conspiring to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. BazzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Manuel QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Charles BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Vance SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Wink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API