Snead v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF CITY OF NY
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment entered pursuant to our opinion of March 12, 1973, 1 and remanded the case for further consideration in light of its decision in Arnett v. Kennedy. 2 We adhere to our prior ruling.
Careful consideration of Arnett does not require any change in this court’s conclusion that the procedures challenged in this case do not comport with due process. The statutory and regulatory scheme approved in Arnett provided the following procedural safeguards;
“The affected employee is provided with 30 days advance written notice of the reasons for his proposed…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4Cited by12 opinions
- Laurido v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Snead v. DEPARTMENT OF SOC. SERV. OF CITY OF NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Ventetuolo v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
- Turano v. Board of Education of Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26District Court, E.D. New York · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.