Legal Opinion
Ventetuolo v. Burke
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 31, 1978No. Civ. A. 5046PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald Ventetuolo and Alfred Santaniello bring this damage action under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 (1970), claiming that defendants, Dr. Fred Burke, then Commissioner of Education for the State of Rhode Island, and Dr. Rudolfo Martinez, then Director of Northeast Area Manpower Institute for Development of Staff (“NEAMIDS”), violated their rights secured by the fourteenth amendment by depriving them of their “liberty” interest in reputation and “property” interest in continued employ ment with NEAMIDS without procedural or substantive due process. In addition,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beller v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kando v. Rhode Island State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Bailey v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.