Legal Opinion

State v. Papusha, Ca2006-11-025 (8-6-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2007No. CA2006-11-025PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Mitchell M. Papusha, appeals his conviction for receiving stolen property. We affirm appellant's conviction.

{¶ 2} On August 24, 2006, Trooper Duteil of the Ohio State Highway Patrol stopped appellant on I-70 for a minor misdemeanor traffic offense. During the stop, appellant got out of the vehicle, a 1991 Ford Explorer, and began walking toward Trooper Duteil, who then told appellant to stand still. When asked if he had any identification, appellant admitted that he was traveling from Colorado with no identification. Appellant initially provided the trooper…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WolonsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chagrin Falls v. PtakOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. Brantley, Ca2006-08-093 (1-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. KokavecOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API