Legal Opinion
Holme, Roberts & Owen v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1990No. 89CA0881PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
Petitioners, Holme, Roberts and Owen (HRO), and its insurer, State Compensation Insurance Authority, contest a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which' determined that a job-related psychiatric disability suffered by the claimant, Suzann Nelson, was compensable under the Colorado Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), § 8-40-101, C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B). We affirm.
The claimant was a legal secretary with twenty years of experience. She had been employed for eight years at HRO when she was unexpectedly demoted from her supervisory position as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Consolidated Freightways v. DrakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Boulder v. StreebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Johnson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City Market, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Organ v. JorgensenColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Riddle v. Ampex Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Vail Associates, Inc. v. Eagle County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Neodata Services v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.