Legal Opinion

Neodata Services v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1991No. 89CA1744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

In seeking our review of an order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) that awarded workers’ compensation benefits to Steven B. Arnold (claimant), the employer, Neodata Services, and its insurer, Associated Indemnity Co., (petitioners) argue that the Panel erroneously refused to apply retroactively certain 1986 amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Act and otherwise erred in awarding benefits to claimant. We conclude that the Panel committed no error and, therefore, affirm its order.

The claimant, after 21 years of employment at Neodata, resigned for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. City of Boulder v. StreebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Gelco Courier v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State Board of Equalization v. American Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Krumback v. Dow Chemical Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Beatrice Foods Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Cook v. McListerColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Neodata Serv. v. IND. CLAIM APP. OFFICEColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Powderhorn Coal Co. v. WeaverColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API