Legal Opinion
Riddle v. Ampex Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1992No. 91CA1058PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PIERCE.
Sharon Kay Riddle, claimant, contests an order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel denying and dismissing her claim for stress-related disability. We affirm.
The claimant alleges that she was rendered totally and temporarily disabled by mental stress caused by the implementation of a no-smoking ban in the electronics manufacturing plant of the employer, Am-pex Corporation.
In 1986, Ampex instituted a smoking restriction which confined tobacco smoking to the employees’ cafeteria. A representative of the employer testified that the restriction was imposed in response to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Varsity Contractors & Home Insurance Co. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Crandall v. Watson-Wilson Transportation System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Eisnach v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Holme, Roberts & Owen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Roe v. Industrial Com'n of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bestway Concrete & Tig Insurance Co v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- General Cable Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Walker v. Jim Fuoco Motor Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Magnetic Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.