Legal Opinion

Jurkovich v. Tomlinson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1995No. 94-181, 94-182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Eh Jurkovich prevailed on a claim of fraudulent inducement before a jury. The district court granted Emery Tomhnson’s, Allyn Mae Tomhnson’s, and Eric A. Tomhn-son’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and Eh Jurkovich appeals that decision. The same jury rejected a counterclaim by Eric Tomhnson and he appeals that decision. We reverse the district court’s decision to grant judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but affirm the jury’s decision rejecting the counterclaim.

I.ISSUES

In Appeal No. 94-181, appellant, Eh Jur-kovieh (Jurkovich), presents the following issues:

A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lavoie v. Safecare Health Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ames v. Sundance State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wilson v. McMahonWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sundown, Inc. v. Pearson Real Estate Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Marchant v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. M & a Construction Corp. v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API