Legal Opinion

M & a Construction Corp. v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1997No. 96-227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

The district court set aside the entry of default against Appellee Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and granted a summary judgment against Appellant M & A Construction Corp. M & A Construction appeals from those orders.

We affirm.

ISSUES

M & A Construction presents the following issues on appeal:

I. The Trial Court’s vacation of the entry of default without finding any specific grounds as required by Rule 60(b) on which to base its decision was contrary to law.

II. The Trial Court’s finding that good cause existed to set aside the entry of default was unsupported by the evidence because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Amernational Industries, Inc. v. Action-Tungsram, Inc., ElectroexportimportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Milligan Ex Rel. Milligan v. Big Valley Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Carlson v. CarlsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rosty v. SkajWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Covington v. W.R. Grace-Conn., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kendrick v. BarkerWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marchant v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To ARW, a minor child: DRWWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API