Legal Opinion
People v. Dees
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1990No. A044836PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
Following denial of a motion to suppress evidence, defendant Randy DeWayne Dees (appellant) proceeded to trial on three drug-related offenses and one charge of possession of a concealable firearm by an ex-felon. A jury found him guilty of (1) possession of methamphetamine for sale; (2) unauthorized possession of a hypodermic needle or syringe; and (3) being under the influence of a controlled substance. It deadlocked on the firearm count, which the district attorney subsequently dismissed. The court found true the allegation of a prior drug conviction and sentenced…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Baraka H.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. DACHINOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000