Legal Opinion

Virginia Dare Stores, Inc. v. Schuman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 26, 1938No. [No. 3, October Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

On July 1st, 1936, and for some time prior thereto, Charles Schuman was employed by Queen City Window Cleaning Company. Virginia Dare Stores, Inc., owner of a store at 15 West Lexington Street, Baltimore, had previously engaged York Ice Machine Company to install an air conditioning system in its store. As a result of the installation, the east and south walls of the store were left spotted and dirty, whereupon York Ice Machine Company employed Queen City Window Cleaning Company to clean them. On the morning of July 1st, 1936, Schuman and one Parr, a co-employee, were sent by the manager of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. M. A. Long Co. v. State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Morgenstern v. SheerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Lorenz v. MacHenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  5. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API